Several users have asked if Flex Builder now supports Eclipse 3.2x, and the answer is yes, as of the just released Flex Builder 2.0.1. Eclipse 3.1 is still installed by default if you select the "Flex Builder and Flex SDK" option, but if you have an existing Eclipse 3.2x installation then select the "Flex Builder Plug-in and Flex SDK" option to install Flex Builder on top of it.
--- Ben
Can you tell us why Flex Builder 2 for Eclipse isn't available for Linux users? Is there any technical reason for this or is this a marketing decision?
Don't get me wrong... I love the functionality it provides. I just hate having to eat the crumbs dropped by the Flex Builder team to get anything working.
There are both technical and marketing reasons. First, while much of Flex Builder is written in Java, there are also native components, such as the debugger and the flash player. Version 9 of these will be available soon for Linux, but building a Linux version of FB still requires incremental work to get all of these pieces working together, not to mention the testing. Which bring me to the marketing reasons. So far, we haven't seen sufficient demand to justify the investment -- though every comment like this means one more vote. We are definitely exploring this option, but haven't made any decisions yet.
In the meantime, you can do Flex development (and soon debugging) on Linux using the free SDK.
Oh, and FYI, the RDS support is most definitely not a crumb dropped by the Flex Builder team, those plugins were built by the ColdFusion team.
--- Ben
However the number of issues being raised on the flexcoders group is extremely worrying. Adobe did not need to release 2.0.1 untested on people. They could have delayed delivery and had an actual beta programme. Well done.
This is called time shifting. Why test properly? Get the developer community to do it, saving Adobe the test cycle.
I have a number of projects I've placed on to the back burner until Flex 2 is ready. I'm assuming some sort of patch in a months time so I can FINALLY begin development.
However the number of issues being raised on the flexcoders group is extremely worrying. Adobe did not need to release 2.0.1 untested on people. They could have delayed delivery and had an actual beta programme. Well done.
This is called time shifting. Why test properly? Get the developer community to do it, saving Adobe the test cycle.
I have a number of projects I've placed on to the back burner until Flex 2 is ready. I'm assuming some sort of patch in a months time so I can FINALLY begin development.
Flex is a big, complicated development framework, and there will always be issues that need to be resolved (and new ones that get introduced when we make fixes). We did, in fact, have a beta program for Flex 2.0.1, and a number of regressions were caught as part of that process. That said, issues always do crop up. That's just the nature of the beast. I think what you'll find among our customers is that the problems are dwarfed by the overall benefits they get from using the product.
Phil Costa
Group Product Manager, Flex
Is there (or can there be) a download for just the cf_fb_extensions.zip and are there any licensing issues with just using that file with a existing version of cfeclipse?
I may have just overlooked it.
Well I've ordered Flex Builder 2, but do hope that the Flex team are up for doing far more incremental releases now that the big 2.0.1 is done. I did note that they added in new features (Modules and Apollo compatibility being a highlight), but it would be good if the Flex team could hold off releasing new features until they had cleared down the remaining issues.
And maybe smaller patches...
Keep up the good work!
1. Very few users keep Linux as a toy - for Beryl or Compiz. It's true that Linux users are 'geeks'. Professionally oriented. They need / like to work in a non closed environments - so why I need Vista or XP license just to make use of Flex Builder ??.
2. Think a bit about the future - not too far, Video / Audio / DTP productions ( not to mention Hollywood production / postproduction studios - Disney, Dreamworks ) - will use Linux as 'de facto' platform - here is room for innovation ( as 2006 prove ) - on MS closed territory Innovation appear to be death.
3. On linux even open source projects will grow with STANDARDS on mind. Inkscape SVG, Scribus PDF, JahShaka, Gimp GEGL, KDE KHTML, Gstreamer, Fluendo, XGL.
...................
A free express version, perhaps without design mode would strenghten the position of Flex as a RIA platform, specially with Silverlight and VS Express on the radar.
This can be used to get Photoshop working as well. I used the same process with getting Photoshop CS working, just different keys. Give it a shot.
I do not run WIndows, do not wish to run Windows. and have no desire to run Windows.
Windows makes me less productive. It is slow, buggy, and a virus and torjan trap!
Flex is very good, please get us a Linux version of Flex Builder. Until then, I cannot use Flex.
--- Ben
Hopefully this gets stable with a designer soon. A lot of the newbie people will probably like Silverlight, and the techies who like designers might as well use it too if they're stuck on Windows anyway...